Menu

Plant hierarchy

Four structures over the same assets. They deliberately do not line up, and the page keeps them apart.

Demonstration project - no figure here describes a real facilityChanges are not saved
Why

Each tree is built from the project's own hierarchy nodes, and the item counts are the assets actually placed in each node.

Writes are validated against the engineering rules and then refused, because no database has been configured for this environment.

Physical plant

11

nodes

Commissioning systems

5

nodes

Test packs

2

nodes

Handover packages

2

nodes

Commissioning systems

System and subsystem: how the plant is commissioned, which does not follow the physical layout.

  • SYS-12Condensate export systemsystemno items
    • SYS-12-01Export pumps and dischargesubsystem19 items
    • SYS-12-02Export meteringsubsystem8 items
  • SYS-31Cooling water systemsystemno items
    • SYS-31-01Cooling water circulationsubsystem9 items

Items in SYS-12-02

Every asset placed in this node, whichever hierarchy placed it.

Assets in SYS-12-02
TagDescriptionClass
E-1216Condensate export coolerequipmentUnverified
PT-1202Condensate export header pressureinstrumentUnverified
TT-1203Condensate export temperatureinstrumentUnverified
FT-1204Condensate export flowinstrumentUnverified
HV-1202Condensate export header isolationvalveUnverified
XV-1205Condensate export shutdown valvevalveUnverified
12-CD-1202-150-A1ACondensate export headerlineUnverified
E-1217Condensate export cooler B (register only, drawn on no sheet)equipmentUnverified

SYS-12-02 in the other structures

The same items, placed by each hierarchy in turn. Where a node's items land in more than one place, the structures disagree about this node.

Physical plant

Test packs

Four structures, never merged

Test packs that span units

Ordinary, and the reason a single tree cannot express this project.

  • ZRF-TP-002U-31, U-12

Where a boundary comes from

A drawn boundary is never an approved one. Why