Menu

Plant hierarchy

Four structures over the same assets. They deliberately do not line up, and the page keeps them apart.

Demonstration project - no figure here describes a real facilityChanges are not saved
Why

Each tree is built from the project's own hierarchy nodes, and the item counts are the assets actually placed in each node.

Writes are validated against the engineering rules and then refused, because no database has been configured for this environment.

Physical plant

11

nodes

Commissioning systems

5

nodes

Test packs

2

nodes

Handover packages

2

nodes

Test packs

What is pressure tested together. A pack routinely spans units.

Items in ZRF-TP-001

Every asset placed in this node, whichever hierarchy placed it.

Assets in ZRF-TP-001
TagDescriptionClass
P-1201ACondensate export pump AequipmentUnverified
P-1201BCondensate export pump B (spare)equipmentUnverified
V-1210Condensate surge drumequipmentVerified
HV-1201Condensate export discharge isolationvalveUnverified
HV-1202Condensate export header isolationvalveUnverified
12-CD-1201-150-A1ACondensate export pump A dischargelineUnverified
12-CD-1202-150-A1ACondensate export headerlineUnverified
12-CD-1203-100-A1ASurge drum level control linelineUnverified

ZRF-TP-001 in the other structures

The same items, placed by each hierarchy in turn. Where a node's items land in more than one place, the structures disagree about this node.

Physical plant

Commissioning systemsspans 2

Four structures, never merged

Test packs that span units

Ordinary, and the reason a single tree cannot express this project.

  • ZRF-TP-002U-31, U-12

Where a boundary comes from

A drawn boundary is never an approved one. Why