Reviewer assignments
Who holds each deliverable, in which discipline, and where the separation of duties is not yet established.
Demonstration project - no figure here describes a real facilityChanges are not saved
Why
Assignments are checked against the capability the person holds and the discipline they work in.
Writes are validated against the engineering rules and then refused, because no database has been configured for this environment.
Deliverables
8
Fully assigned
5
Missing a checker or reviewer
1
People with a review capability
4
Separation of duties is established here
Assigning the author as their own checker is caught when somebody tries it, not three weeks later when the deliverable cannot be approved and nobody remembers why.
Assignments
| Deliverable | Discipline | Stage | Author | Checker | Reviewer | Approver | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZRF-LCR-0021 | INS | draft | M. Silva | none | none | none | In discipline |
| ZRF-CMP-0007 | COM | in check | J. Novak | S. Lindqvist | none | none | In discipline |
| ZRF-ETR-0004 | ELE | draft | T. Adeyemi | none | none | none | In discipline |
| ZRF-HTP-0015 | PIP | in review | A. Rahman | N. Okonkwo | S. Lindqvist | none | Reviewer is PRO |
| ZRF-ITP-0003 | QUA | approved | N. Okonkwo | A. Rahman | S. Lindqvist | R. Haddad | Reviewer is PRO |
| ZRF-ITP-0008 | QUA | in review | N. Okonkwo | A. Rahman | S. Lindqvist | R. Haddad | Reviewer is PRO |
| ZRF-PEP-0001 | PMG | issued | K. Mensah | R. Haddad | D. Farouk | R. Haddad | Reviewer is PRO |
| ZRF-PEP-0001-RA | PMG | superseded | K. Mensah | R. Haddad | D. Farouk | R. Haddad | Reviewer is PRO |
Assign somebody
A reviewer from another discipline
Allowed, and flagged. A process engineer reviewing a piping procedure for interface fit is a real and useful thing. It is also how a document gets reviewed by somebody not competent to review it, so the mismatch is shown and a person decides.