Review comments
Every comment raised, its severity, its answer, and who may close it.
Demonstration project - no figure here describes a real facilityChanges are not saved
Why
Anybody may answer a comment. Only the reviewer who raised it may close it, which is enforced in the page, in the write service and by a database constraint.
Writes are validated against the engineering rules and then refused, because no database has been configured for this environment.
Comments
6
Open
2
Blocking and open
3
Closed
2
| Deliverable | Section | Severity | Comment | Raised by | Response | State | Who may close |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZRF-HTP-0015 | 6 Procedure | Technical | The vent sequence appears to be missing between steps 6.4 and 6.5. | S. Lindqvist | Withdrawn: the vent is in 6.3 and I had read the steps out of order. No change needed. | withdrawn | only S. Lindqvist |
| ZRF-HTP-0015 | 5.1 | Blocking | The test pressure basis cites the line list, which states 26 barg, while the datasheet for P-1201A states 24 barg. The derived test pressure cannot be stated until this is resolved. | N. Okonkwo | Agreed. Raised as a reconciliation item against P-1201A; the section now states the gap. | answered | only N. Okonkwo |
| ZRF-HTP-0015 | 6.1 | Technical | The isolation list includes HV-1202, which is on the header and outside the test boundary for SYS-12-01. | N. Okonkwo | Removed from the isolation list at Rev B. | closed | closed |
| ZRF-HTP-0015 | 9 | Blocking | Acceptance criteria state a 2 hour hold. Appendix D requires the hold to be witnessed; the procedure does not say who witnesses it or what they sign. | S. Lindqvist | not answered | open | only S. Lindqvist |
The author cannot close their own answer
Most review tools let them, which turns a review into a formality: the reviewer discovers at issue that their objection was closed by the person it was aimed at. Here, anybody may answer and only the raiser may close.