Engineering assistant
The records a question touches, with their provenance. No model answers anything: none has been activated.
Demonstration project - no figure here describes a real facilityChanges are not saved
Why
Retrieval over the project's own records is implemented and runs. Generation is not: no AI provider has been activated, and the page refuses rather than producing an ungrounded answer.
Writes are validated against the engineering rules and then refused, because no database has been configured for this environment.
Documents in scope
3
Requirements in scope
1
Readings available
131
Answers generated
0
An ungrounded answer is worse than no answer
A model that answers without the project’s records produces a confident paragraph with no citations. In an engineering context somebody acts on it. When a provider is activated, the grounding set below is what it will be given, and every sentence will have to cite one of these records or be refused.
Ask
The grounding set
What a model would be given, and what a person can read instead.
| Document | Title | Read |
|---|---|---|
| ZRF-CTR-APX-A | Contract Appendix A - Scope of Work | Read |
| ZRF-CTR-APX-F | Contract Appendix F - Documentation and Deliverables | Not read |
| ZRF-SCH-0001 | Project Schedule - Detailed Design and Construction | Read |
| Reference | What it requires |
|---|---|
| REQ-A-021 | The Contractor shall submit every deliverable listed in the master document register for Company review before construction. |
What a grounded answer would have to do
- Cite one of the records above for every statement it makes.
- Refuse to state a value that two documents disagree about, rather than picking the more confident reading.
- Say that a figure is unverified where it is, rather than presenting a reading as a fact.
- Decline the question entirely where the grounding set holds nothing relevant, instead of generalising.